|
The
Arts Council has been heavily criticised
for its foreshortened appeals process and
while claiming that it would not be swayed
by public opinion, a high-profile, celebrity-led
campaign by The Bush Theatre has clearly
helped safeguard that theatre's funding.
WATERMANS
TO SUE
Watermans
is defiant in the face of the cuts, vowing
to appeal against this decision, through
the courts if necessary. Its lawyers have
always believed that it had a very strong
case as the main objection from the Arts
Council was that they were not convinced
of Hounslow Council's long-term commitment
to the arts centre. In a very strong letter
to the Arts Council, Peter Thompson, leader
of the Council, made the borough's commitment
to Watermans very clear while at the same
time protesting about the nature of the
Arts Council's decision making process.
"Hounslow Council had not been consulted
by the Arts Council or been asked directly
about these judgements before they were
made. It still seems amazing that the Arts
council can continue to justify these judgements
in the face of universal evidence to the
contrary", said Mr Thompson.
TARA
ARTS REMAINS "UNSHAKEABLE"
Meanwhile,
Tara Arts has said that it remains "unshakeable"
despite the Arts Council cut. Founding Director
Jatinder Varma, whose company has staged
many successful productions over the last
30 years for audiences of all ages, said
in a statement "this is indeed bad
news for the company. It is equally bad
news for the state of the arts in this country.
Our belief in our cross-cultural theatre
work, though dented by the Arts Council's
recent decision, remains unshakeable. Our
only response therefore is to prove them
wrong - and with your help, we will."
The company, currently touring with a version
Shakespeare's 'The Tempest' is launching
an appeal for financial support for the
remainder of its 2008 season.
WIELDING
THE AXE INDISCRIMINATELY
The
withdrawal of funding, or "disinvestment"
as the Arts Council prefers to call it,
also seems indiscriminate. Withdrawing funds
from two of the most established practitioners
in Asian Arts - Watermans is the defacto
leading venue for non-English language theatre,
dance, comedy and new media events and Tara
Arts has over 30 years experience in producing
groundbreaking Asian-influenced theatre
- goes contrary to the Council's assertion
for wanting to drive "excellence in
arts" and empowering "artistic
risk". Diverting funds from established
practitioners able to deliver in favour
of new, un-tried arts bodies seems contrary
to the Arts Council's aims.
In
a statement, the Arts Council said "our
ambitious vision for the future of the arts
in England includes the investment of £1.3
billion between 2008 and 2011. The strategy
is designed to shape an arts sector committed
to delivering excellent art to the widest
range of people and one empowered to take
artistic risk.
The
money will be invested in nearly 900 arts
organisations - including 81 new organisations
- and more than 75% of Arts Council regularly-funded
organisations received increases in their
funding in line with, or above, inflation."
However, the only "winner" from
this year's review is British Indian dance
company Angika that is set to receive £80,000
funding for the first time in 2008/09.
A
number of Asian Bodies have managed to safeguard
their funding, but, the total of £5,616,047
invested solely in Asian Arts represents
a mere fraction of the £1.3billion
available in the next three years.
ASIAN
ORGANISATIONS FUNDED BY THE ARTS COUNCIL
|
ORGANISATION
|
2008/09
Funding (£)
|
| Angika |
£
80,000
|
| Belgrave
Baheno Peepul Centre |
£
85,000
|
| Charnwood
Arts (core grant) * |
£
133,815
|
| Leicester
Belgrave Mela |
£
30,825
|
| Mainstream
Partnership |
£
57,515
|
| New
Art Exchange |
£
407,915
|
| Nottingham
Asian Arts Council |
£
26,385
|
| Surtal
Asian Arts (Derby) |
£
31,660
|
| Akademi |
£
222,274
|
| Akram
Khan Company |
£
195,166
|
| Asian
Music Circuit |
£
513,500
|
| Bharatiya
Vidya Bhavan (Bhavan Centre) |
£
143,780
|
| Kali
Theatre Company |
£
200,000
|
| Moti
Roti Company |
£
309,060
|
| Shobana
Jeyasingh Dance Company |
£
328,640
|
| Tamasha
Theatre Company Ltd |
£
320,000
|
| Tara
Arts Group Ltd * |
£
170,000
|
| Vayu
Naidu |
£
65,000
|
| Pakistan
Cultural Society |
£
28,910
|
| Black
Arts Alliance (North West) |
£
64,496
|
| Milap
Festival Trust |
£
211,920
|
| Multicultural
Arts and Media Centre |
£
52,274
|
| Peshkar
Productions |
£
77,128
|
| Rasa
Productions |
£
47,550
|
| Shisha
(South Asian Vis Arts & Crafts) |
£
191,125
|
| Art
Asia Trust Ltd (Southampton) |
£
153,562
|
| Rifco
Arts |
£
126,676
|
| Asian
Arts Agency (Bristol) |
£
25,747
|
| BME
producer (Birmingham) |
£
72,466
|
| Chitraleka
Dance Company |
£
71,064
|
| Sampad |
£
248,198
|
| The
Drum (Birmingham) |
£
603,396
|
| Freedom
Studios (formerly Asian Theatre School)
|
£
86,000
|
| Kala
Sangam (Bradford) |
£
150,000
|
| South
Asian Arts Uk |
£
85,000
|
| TOTAL |
£5,616,407
|
*
Charnwood Arts and Tara Arts have both
lost a large percentage of their Arts
Council grants.
WHITE
& ELITIST ARTS IN THE UK?
A
quick glance at the Arts Council's regularly
funded organisations across England shows
that not all organisations are loosing out.
Opera grabs a lion's share of the grants
with The Royal Opera House awarded £26,961,420
(2008/9), English National Opera receiving
£17,479,333 (2008/09), Opera North
getting £9,400,953 (2008/09), English
Touring Opera set to get £1,474,036
(2008/09) and Glyndebourne receiving £1,498,979
(2008/09).
Ballet
is also a winner with the English National
Ballet receiving £6,537,950 (2008/09),
Sadler's Wells getting £2,273,494
(2008/09), Northern Ballet receiving £2,692,486
(2008/09) and the Rambert Dance Company
awarded £2,119,300 (2008/09).
English
Theatre is another winner with the South
Bank Centre receiving the highest grant
of £20,240,931 (2008/09), the Royal
National Theatre awarded £18,715,432
(2008/09), the Royal Shakespeare Company
awarded £15,179,676 (2008/09) and
the English Stage Company (Royal Court Theatre)
receiving £ 2,189,628 (2008/09).
ARTS
COUNCIL HAS A DUTY TO BE TRANSPARENT AND
FAIR
Speaking
at a public meeting on 24 January 2008,
held by the Shadow Culture team, on the
Arts Council's cuts, Shadow Culture Secretary,
Jeremy Hunt said: "The Arts Council
is right to focus on excellence and innovation
but it has a duty to be consistent, transparent
and fair. Why then is it cutting funds from
organisations that its own website says
are world famous for their innovation and
quality?
"The
Government harps on about an end to boom
and bust but that is exactly what the arts
world faces."
ARTS
COUNCIL SURE IT MADE "THE RIGHT DECISIONS"
A
spokesperson for the Arts Council defended
their position saying that, following the
wide-ranging review, the Council was "absolutely
certain that they had made the right decision.
Obviously nobody likes to have their funding
withdrawn, the organisations most likely
to be affected are those who were complacent
during the ongoing review process".
In
relation to funding of Asian arts, the representative
said "On a wider level the percentage
of the overall BME-led portfolio has risen
from 7% to 8%. In 2007/8 BME led organisations
received £7.5 million, this now rises to
£8 million. There are several BME organisations
which are receiving significant increases,
among them are: New Art Exchange (£401,915)
and Arts Asia Trust (£153,562). We
are making positive steps towards meeting
our own target to make sure that 10% of
our portfolio of regularly funded organisations
are BME led".
WATERMANS
PETITION
It
remains to be seen how Asian Arts organisations
like Watermans & Tara Arts will fair
but over 3,000 people have already signed
a petition to 'Support Watermans 100%' including
Leader of Hounslow Council Peter Thompson,
Local MPs Alan and Ann Keen and Councillors
Andrew Dakers, Ruth Cadbury and Matt Harmer.
"We still need support as a court will
consider the level of public support in
its final decision" said Peter Thompson.
VOTE
OF NO CONFIDENCE IN THE ARTS COUNCIL
The
funding cuts have even led to an online
e-petition on the No 10 Downing Street website
urging people to "support the industry
by joining the growing band of people who
have no confidence in The Arts Council."
The petition, which ends on 31 March 2008
has drawn 5,850 signatories so far.
Created
by Tammy Jones of Stop the Cull it reads
"Nearly 200 arts organisations including
37 theatre companies, have been told they
are to lose all revenue funding from Arts
Council England, in the bloodiest cull in
ACE's 61-year history. The move to axe subsidy
completely from 195 organisations, for most
from April 2008, is leading to threats of
closure and redundancies across the country.
Not only will this deprive many areas of
any cultural output but also ghettoise diversity
and create a more divided and less integrated
society when this public money should be
doing the opposite."
WHAT
CAN I DO?
If
you want to help save the funding available
to Asian Arts organisations in the UK, here's
what you can do:
1.
Sign the 'Support
Watermans 100%' petition.
2. Sign the e-petition 'to reverse
the political impetus towards reducing
funding of the arts'
on the 10 Downing Street website (closes
11 May 2008)
3. Sign the 'No Confidence in the Arts
Council' e-petition
on the 10 Downing Street website (Closes
31 March 2008)
4. Complain online
to the Arts Council.
5. Write to your local MP - click
here to find out who this.
6. Write to the Department
of Culture Media & Sports (DCMS)
7.
If you live in London, write to the Mayor
of London.
SOURCES
Art
Council regularly
funded organisations by region (1.3MB,
doc)
Arts Council non-renewals
2008 (100kb, doc).
Arts Council disinvestments
procedural guide (70KB, doc)
|