|
WHAT
DIVERSITY MEANS IN PUBLIC BROADCASTING
By Colin Prescod (31 March 2004). Reprinted
by permission of the IRR.
BBC
Radio London presenter Henry Bonsu has been axed because his bosses
said he was 'too intellectual'. Whereas in the past, distinct Black
media voices were shut down in the name of 'multiculturalism', today
it is done under the fashionable banner of 'diversity'. Something
about the taunt 'too intellectual' rang a bell. This was one of
the lines used when the BBC's fledgling TV Black production department
was shut down, back in 1991.
Back
then, no big fuss was made about the casual closing down of the
dedicated African-Caribbean Programmes department and its replacement
with a 'Multicultural' department. Today, 'diversity' is the new
'multiculturalism'. While there is a hunger for serious Black public
broadcasting, what we get instead is 'diversity management'.
In
the early 1990s, it was the multiculturalist agenda that provided
the justification for disbanding an exciting African-Caribbean TV
programmes department, then based at Pebble Mill in Birmingham.
At the time, we were told that BBC bosses could no longer justify
privileging just Asian and African-Caribbean community voices. Never
mind the very real militant Black history that had resulted in opening
small doors to these leading anti-racist communities. So, the two
relatively young departments had to be disbanded and their interests
merged with those of other minorities in a new Multicultural Programmes
department - where ALL minority voices were to be given an airing.
Some of us argued, with good reason, against the wisdom of this
project, but only in-house and to no avail. And the erstwhile Editor
of the Asian Programmes department was willing to take up the post
of Head of the new Multicultural Programmes set-up.
Within
a couple of years, the nonsense of the 'experiment' was exposed.
From memory, in the years 1991 to 1993, the Multicultural department
broadcast just one, major seven-part documentary series focused
on African-Caribbean subjects. These programmes were so deliberately
aimed at only digging out sensationalist items, that they provoked
outraged responses from Black media watchers across the land. No
other minority voices (say Chinese, Vietnamese, Turkish, Cypriot)
ever featured in broadcast programmes from the Multicultural department.
Interestingly and divisively, Asian programming flourished.
This
state of affairs became so embarrassing that, in 1993, the failed
Multicultural department was disbanded and its Head dismissed. There
was no admission of managerial fault from within the BBC. There
was no apology to the many who, down the years, had worked at laying
in the solid foundations for BBC Black programme production. And
there was no explanation offered to the constituencies served by
disappointed Black programme-makers. So much for public broadcasting's
accountability.
The
pioneering work of Vastiana Belfon and her team of producers and
directors is hardly remembered today, even by workers in the industry.
In the course of half a decade, they had taken the BBC's Black TV
product from a cramped magazine-format, Ebony, to a departmental
output that delivered a spread of programmes, many of them deservedly
gaining prime-time broadcast slots. There were sharp, cutting-edge
music and entertainment programmes, talk-shows, current affairs
magazine programmes, as well as serious documentary films covering
the national as well as the international. Vastiana Belfon guided
and encouraged her team - giving answer to the oft-asked questions:
'What's Black perspective programming?' and 'Can it be both Black
and available to wider audiences?'. These were questions that had
been used to intimidate Black media workers during all the years
that they had been excluded from making the attempt. Under Vastiana,
and not without testing production challenges, some exciting and
fresh work was made - stylish, engaging, daring and always based
on sound journalistic practice. BBC bosses should have been proud
of this work and protective of its production base. But there is
little evidence that they were. And the easy manner in which they
turned it back suggests that the work was never valued as adding
substance to the BBC's core practice. It is as though the department
was merely a temporary contrivance, to duck the charge that the
BBC was a too-White institution.
ONLY
ASIAN PROGRAMMING IS FLOURISHING AT THE BBC
Since
that early 1990s fiasco, there is evidence that the BBC has attempted
to revert to the status quo ante - again, to my knowledge, with
no considered reflection involving any of the Black programme-making
expertise that it itself had nurtured. Today, the BBC's Asian programmes
production base survives. But the BBC's Black African/Caribbean
TV production and programming have never recovered from the thoughtless
and stubborn decision to shut down its Birmingham-based department.
The
arguments for the shut-down were intellectually, politically and
managerially weak, from the start. Lumping all the marginalised
voices together in the name of multiculture, and hoping to get all
production departments across the corporation to take up a multicultural
programme-making responsibility, was never convincing to anyone
who knew anything about the values, professional and personal, of
those who dominated production decisions. Over the last decade,
attempts to restart a Black news and current affairs operation at
TV Centre, alongside a Black entertainment programmes operation
centred in Manchester, and a Black drama development initiative,
again at TV Centre, have all proved unsustained. There must be many
unregistered tales of disappointment.
To
put it directly - it is as though the BBC's 'White perspective'
management has never understood or trusted its 'Black perspective'
production and programming operations. This translates to Black
programme-makers as undervaluing and dismissing of their worth.
This is particularly galling, when we all know how vital the Black
Brit presence is and has been as a driver of contemporary British
culture - part and parcel of how its communities have managed to
force a way on to the media establishment's agenda.
When
was the last time that the nation's major public broadcaster reflected
deeply on the nature of the 'publics' that it now serves or, indeed,
on the notion of 'serving'? If the new-spin notion of 'diversity'
is to be of any use to new thinking on these matters, the Governors
must take up the challenge of going beyond the cosmetics of the
employment-numbers game, and must address the production and programming
realities integral to encouraging, nurturing and valuing a diversity
of perspectives.
Colin
Prescod worked in the BBC's African/Caribbean TV programmes department
from 1989 to 1991, and was Head of the department, briefly, in 1990
to 1991.
Top
|